You definitely need a good network monitoring solution if you find your network infrastructure expanding while your organization greatly depends on the network’s availability and reliability. There are several options available, and we have discussed the comparisons of some of them. This time, we are going to take a look at the comparisons between Zabbix vs Icinga2.
Both Zabbix and Icinga2 are free and open-source network monitoring software applications. Hence, these are great options if you don’t want to spend too many dollars in order to save some budget. Still, Zabbix and Icinga2 are very different from each other, so continue reading below before you make your choice.
Ease of Use
You will most probably lean more towards Zabbix, if simple installation and operation are your top priorities. After all, one of the things that Zabbix is known for is the simplicity and ease of use. It is much easier to set up, compared to many other options, and it comes with a very powerful web GUI. Less experienced users can easily understand the settings and configurations because it provides step-by-step wizards for those. However, more experienced users may find the wizards more tedious, preferring to edit config files manually.
On the other hand, Icinga2 evolved from a part of the Nagios core, and both are known for their easy basic configuration. However, Icinga2’s custom configurations are somehow more difficult because it requires you to perform manual modifications – something like the Prometheus in Zabbix vs Prometheus. Icinga2’s installation may end up like a “personal puzzle” that integrates various different patches and self-made/third-party codes. Nevertheless, the improved GUI is a thing to be appreciated as well.
Zabbix is decent for “basic” uses, and it is good at what it does. However, it does not have much to offer in terms of customization. The API provides some solution, but not full control that simple config files can give. It lacks advanced alert and report templates, and it does not have real-time reporting.
On the other hand, being a fork of Nagios, Icinga2’s greatest strength is customization. With sufficient knowledge, creating your own remote checks becomes a piece of cake. You can also transform it into an incredibly powerful tool to monitor particular or isolated cases.
Zabbix has been designed to be an enterprise-grade solution, and it is suitable for networks with up to 10,000 nodes. However, due to the PHP engine and web GUI, you may start to notice minimal performance degradation with more than 1,000 nodes. Nevertheless, for small and medium sized networks, Zabbix offers excellent stable performance.
On the other hand, Icinga2 is quite versatile that it is suitable for small, medium, and large networks. The performance is also good and stable. You can say that Icinga2 has the better edge when handling very large networks.
|- Easier setup and configuration||- Easy basic setup, but difficult configuration and customization|
|- Limited customization features||- Great customization|
|- No real-time reporting||- Can be integrated with other tools|
|- Decent performance for up to 10,000 nodes||- Suitable for small, medium, and large networks|
In general, Zabbix makes a better choice. Zabbix is easy to use and powerful enough to meet most requirements. However, if you need a great extent of customization – or real-time reporting – you may need to choose Icinga2 instead. Although Icinga2 has a steeper learning curve and is quite more complicated, it offers great customization and can turn into an incredibly powerful monitoring tool.