Choosing the right configuration management software is very important, as it will affect the entire workflow of your team. Today’s challenge to system admins and devs is much more challenging than ever before, with much higher numbers of servers and apps. Below, we will see the comparisons between two popular solutions for this, Ansible vs Puppet.
The questions that people usually ask when choosing between Ansible and Puppet include:
– Which one is easier to learn and deploy?
– What operating systems do they support?
– Which one is the more flexible and adaptable?
– Which one does have better performance?
We will answer those questions below. So, continue reading!
Ease Of Use
Between the two options, it is actually quite tricky to tell which one is the easier one to use, as they have distinctive benefits and weaknesses. In general, Ansible is easier to learn. Most people are able to get a working understanding of Ansible in a relatively short time. Because of this, Ansible is easier to adopt, especially for a new team. In addition, Ansible also has agent-less deploy so the installation should be easy.
On the other hand, Puppet also offers easy installation. It has a very good and mature GUI, which enhances the user experience. However, Puppet may be unwieldy and complex at times, and the learning curve is relatively steeper.
Supported Operating Systems
The next thing that you have to consider when choosing a configuration management solution is the supported operating systems. Of course, this heavily depends on your projects. Ansible initially only supported Linux, but according to Wikipedia, it has started to support Windows since version 1.7. In addition, Ansible can also deploy to cloud and virtualization environments including Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web services, VMware, Atomic, and Google Cloud Platform.
Similarly, Puppet is designed to support Unix-like operating systems. It is a mature solution which supports all major Linux distributions, Microsoft Windows, macOS, Solaris, and BSD, among others. It has been used by numerous large corporations such as Wikimedia Foundation, Reddit, Mozilla, Dell, Twitter, PayPal, and Google.
Flexibility and Performance
Many people are interested in Ansible because it has good flexibility and excellent performance. It is based on a ubiquitous Python language, and its CLI can accept commands in nearly any language. It has low overhead, and the performance is smooth and fast.
On the other hand, Puppet is Ruby-based and is running its own declarative language for describing system configuration. Because of this, it is not very flexible. The customers may eventually need to learn the declarative language. It is rather slow when responding to customer concerns. Compared to the Python-based configuration management solutions, its overall performance is relatively slower.
Ansible vs Puppet
|- Easier to learn and use, agent-less deploy||- Good and mature GUI, but steeper learning curve|
|- Supports Linux, Windows, and cloud/virtualization environments||- Supports Linux, Windows, and other Unix-like platforms|
|- Python-based||- Ruby-based|
|- Accepts commands in nearly any language||- Has its own declarative language|
|- Better performance||- Relatively slower|
Between Ansible vs Puppet, we recommend you to choose Ansible. This solution is easier to learn and use, with good flexibility and excellent performance. It already supports Linux and Windows platforms as well as cloud and virtualization environments.