If you are either a network admin or system admin, you certainly know how detrimental it is if you use the wrong tools for the job. Choosing the right monitoring solution for your network is one of the toughest tasks before you actually start doing the job. There are various tools available on the market, but they all range from under-featured to straightly overpriced. No worries! In the following article, we will discuss about the comparisons between Zenoss vs Zabbix. These are two popular monitoring tools. Zenoss is usually preferred when cross-platform compatibility and great event management flexibility are needed. On the other hand, Zabbix is the choice of many people when simplicity and effectiveness are both top priorities. See more of the details below!
Zenoss is a free, open-source management platform for applications, servers, virtual servers, and networks that is based on the Zope application server. It comes with a web interface where system admins can monitor performance, availability, inventory, configuration, and events. It is written mostly in Python with a few parts with Java. Its agentless monitoring is the strong point that makes it stand out.
Zenoss comes in three versions: the free and open-source Zenoss Core which has limited features, the on-premise commercial Zenoss Service Dynamics, and the software-as-a-service Zenoss as a Service (ZaaS). Zenoss has been used by customers of various backgrounds, including government agencies, retail companies, financial institutions, as well as other technology companies and service providers.
Zenoss Installation and Features
Before we delve deeper into the offerings of Zenoss, it is best if we first note that Zenoss requires very careful installation. Make sure that you read the documentation properly to avoid any potential problem. The process involves fairly lengthy command lines. If you are leery of the command line interface, you may want to hand over the installation process to someone who isn’t. Nevertheless, once the command line part is complete, the rest of the process is all web-based and easy to finish.
Now, what sets Zenoss vs Zabbix apart is that Zenoss comes with an incredibly flexible and very tweakable dashboard that happen to be also quite powerful. You can adjust and customize the dashboard to show only the information that you need. It has very flexible event management, too.
The next great thing about Zenoss is the cross-platform capability. It can perform monitoring on other services and nodes without requiring you to install any agent, and it is compatible with nearly all platforms. So, this is a viable choice if your system has several different platforms working together.
That said, depending on the installation’s complexity and the monitored elements, adapting Zenoss can be tricky and difficult. It only has MySQL and its own database, without any integration for other database systems. Its topology maps are also pretty basic.
Zenoss has great flexibility and versatility, but the performance is not very impressive. It is not always the best for monitoring wide environments. This is because the database layer can get very large and heavy on a particularly wide environment, and the panel can be slow on certain installations. But it is very good for relatively simple and not-so-large networks and systems.
Zabbixis a free and open-source enterprise-grade monitoring software solution for applications and networks. It is able to monitor and track the status of various network hardware, servers, and services. It is one of the most popular tools on the market. It has an active community where you can find help and support. It is simple and user-friendly, yet very strong and efficient at the low levels. It also has powerful agentless monitoring, but you can install its agents to expand the monitoring capabilities. (See also : Zabbix vs Grafana)
Zabbix Installation and Features
Zabbix is much simpler to install. The installer will guide you step-by-step to complete the process, and it can be configured easily. The GUI is neat, intuitive, and powerful. The web frontend is written in PHP, whereas the backend is written in C. It may use MySQL, Oracle, SQLite, PostgreSQL, or IBM DB2 to store data.
Zabbix provides several monitoring options. First, you can perform simple checks to verify the responsiveness and availability of standard services, such as HTTP and SMTP, without installing any agent. Second, you can install an agent on a Windows or UNIX host to monitor hardware-related statistics such as disk space, CPU load, and network utilization. Third, as an alternative to installing an agent, you can perform monitoring checks using custom parameters through various protocols such as SNMP, ICMP, TCP, SSH, and Telnet.
However, the difference between Zenoss vs Zabbix in terms of reporting is that Zabbix does not have real-time reporting capabilities. But it does support a variety of near real-time notifications, including XMPP. Creating and defining alert/report templates can be tricky, and configurations require multiple clicks and steps. It is somehow difficult to purge when experiencing an error.
At the low levels, Zabbix is very powerful and efficient. As a result, it can be very fast and responsive when handling a relatively small network. It is generally faster than Zenoss, especially if there are fewer than 1,000 nodes in the network.
However, due to the bottleneck effect of the PHP frontend, Zabbix’s performance may start to diminish when monitoring more than 1,000 nodes. But it is still very usable for networks with up to 10,000 nodes. You can still use Zabbix without a significant performance issue if you haven’t reached the threshold. So, it is suitable for small, medium, and large networks.
|- Tricky to install and configure||- Much easier and simpler to install and configure|
|- Powerful agentless monitoring||- Powerful monitoring with or without agents|
|- Great flexibility in event management and real-time reporting||- Only has near real-time notifications|
|- Only has MySQL and its own database||- May use MySQL, Oracle, SQLite, PostgreSQL, or IBM DB2|
|- Performance may be slow on large environments and certain installations||- Good performance for up to 10,000 nodes|
So, Zenoss vs Zabbix, which is the one to choose? In general, Zabbix is better. It is much easier to install and configure. It can work with various database systems. It also has powerful agentless monitoring capabilities. The performance is excellent, suitable for small, medium, and large networks. However, you can choose Zenoss if you need greater flexibility in event management and real-time reporting. But, be careful, Zenoss is quite tricky to install, and the performance may be slow on large environments and certain installations.